Stockfish Testing Queue

Pending - 10 tests 12.5 hrs

03-12-17 sg master diff
Pending... (12.0 hrs)
40000 @ 180+1.8 th 1 VLTC now with higher hash 256 MB (see https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/fishcooking/A78xxpyU8dI). Regression test until "Use constexpr when makes sense" (even lower throughput)
10-12-17 SC context diff
LLR: -1.35 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 23000 W: 4164 L: 4157 D: 14679
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 1. Testing with [0,4] as I cannot decide between [0,5] and [-3, 1]
09-12-17 vd verifyReplacement diff
LLR: 0.08 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 49266 W: 8884 L: 8964 D: 31418
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 stc, take 3
05-12-17 vd skipEarly diff
LLR: -2.30 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 71291 W: 12899 L: 13144 D: 45248
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 stc
05-12-17 pb queenBeforeStanding diff
LLR: -0.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 9000 W: 1618 L: 1620 D: 5762
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Kingdanger: no Rook/Bishop-Check when square is defended by our Queen (see commit notes). Test against passed patch.
04-12-17 An lmr_iid_D diff
LLR: -2.16 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 16430 W: 2997 L: 3018 D: 10415
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Same as lmr_iid_B, but apply for ALL searches (non pv) that stem from IID, not just the first (Prio -1)
04-12-17 sn softer_LMR diff
LLR: -0.92 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 13504 W: 2412 L: 2484 D: 8608
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Do not use the improving flag in reduction() : always true
04-12-17 An skip_early_cutnode_lmr diff
LLR: -2.39 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 50000 W: 9098 L: 8986 D: 31916
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 More LMR when we skipped early pruning
03-12-17 Ro SimplifyBD diff
LLR: 1.49 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 89901 W: 11468 L: 11509 D: 66924
sprt @ 60+0.6 th 1 LTC for 2 almost non functional changes testing for non regression
03-12-17 SC optimism diff
LLR: -2.26 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 28261 W: 5079 L: 5055 D: 18127
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 9. (more or less opposite of take 8).

Active - 94 machines 421 cores 1.60M nps (675.46M total nps) 540 games/minute

Machine Cores MNps System Version Running on Last updated
robal
5
2.12 Darwin 17.2.0 59 queen_mobility seconds ago
Pking_cda
7
1.70 Linux 3.13.0-106-lowlatency 59 queen_mobility seconds ago
teddybaer
15
1.30 Linux 4.9.0-4-amd64 59 queen_mobility seconds ago
ElbertoOne
6
1.84 Windows 10 59 queen_mobility seconds ago
vdbergh
5
1.54 Linux 2.6.32-696.1.1.el6.x86_64 59 queen_mobility seconds ago
marrco
7
1.48 Windows 8.1 59 queen_mobility seconds ago
biffhero
1
1.09 Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 59 queen_mobility seconds ago
IgorLeMasson
2
1.00 Windows 10 59 tuneSW seconds ago
teddybaer
11
1.33 Linux 4.9.0-4-amd64 59 context seconds ago
scacchicamelot
3
1.20 Windows 8.1 59 context seconds ago
mibere
5
1.97 Linux 4.9.0-4-amd64 59 context seconds ago
Thanar
3
0.86 Windows 8.1 59 context seconds ago
cw
1
2.08 Windows 8.1 59 context seconds ago
Lactose
2
2.66 Windows 10 59 context seconds ago
drabel
3
2.53 Windows post2008Server 59 context seconds ago
cw
1
1.75 Windows 10 59 context seconds ago
sqrt2
3
2.27 Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 59 context seconds ago
sunu
2
1.39 Linux 4.14.0-4.slh.2-aptosid-amd64 59 context seconds ago
tvijlbrief
3
2.12 Linux 4.4.0-87-generic 59 context seconds ago
eva42
1
1.52 Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 59 context seconds ago
Pking_cda
3
2.73 Linux 3.13.0-106-lowlatency 59 context seconds ago
fastgm
4
1.76 Linux 4.4.0-43-Microsoft 59 context seconds ago
Thanar
3
1.30 Windows 10 59 context seconds ago
jromang
3
0.51 Linux 4.13.5-1-ARCH 59 context seconds ago
brabos
7
0.99 Windows 10 59 context seconds ago
aquallung
3
1.00 Windows 7 59 context seconds ago
mgrabiak
2
2.05 Windows 10 59 context seconds ago
lantonov
1
0.69 Windows 8 59 context seconds ago
Vizvezdenec
1
2.10 Windows 8.1 59 context seconds ago
tvijlbrief
1
1.80 Linux 4.4.0-103-generic 59 context seconds ago
cw
1
2.10 Windows 8.1 59 context seconds ago
speedycpu
3
2.48 Windows 8.1 59 context seconds ago
horst.prack
1
1.27 Linux 4.13.0-1-amd64 59 context seconds ago
davar
3
1.97 Windows 8.1 59 context seconds ago
geoffeg
1
0.79 Linux 3.10.102 59 context seconds ago
TheDarkHorde
2
2.14 Linux 4.14.5-gentoo 59 contem seconds ago
Prcuvu
7
0.73 Windows 10 59 contem seconds ago
Bobo1239
1
1.73 Linux 4.13.12-1-ARCH 59 contem 2 minutes ago
mibere
5
2.03 Linux 4.9.0-4-amd64 59 contem seconds ago
mgrabiak
3
1.02 Windows 10 59 contem seconds ago
mgrabiak
3
1.14 Windows 7 59 contem seconds ago
drabel
1
1.38 Windows 10 59 contem seconds ago
tchess
4
2.21 Linux 4.13.9-1-ARCH 59 contem seconds ago
lozza
1
2.35 Windows 10 59 contem seconds ago
rkl
2
2.24 Linux 4.14.4-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64 59 contem seconds ago
JojoM
6
1.24 Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 59 contem seconds ago
marrco
3
2.26 Linux 4.4.0-43-Microsoft 59 contem seconds ago
robal
2
2.24 Windows 10 59 contem seconds ago
vdv
30
1.50 Linux 4.4.0-98-generic 59 contem seconds ago
Thanar
3
0.90 Windows 7 59 contem seconds ago
ianh2105
10
1.93 Windows 7 59 contem seconds ago
grandphish2
5
2.42 Windows 10 59 contem seconds ago
dex
7
0.87 Windows 10 59 contem seconds ago
gvreuls
3
1.30 Linux 4.13.16-202.fc26.x86_64 59 contem seconds ago
tchess
2
1.04 Windows 7 59 contem 3 minutes ago
JojoM
2
1.93 Windows 10 59 contem seconds ago
horst.prack
1
1.18 Linux 4.13.0-1-amd64 59 contem 2 minutes ago
cw
5
1.63 Windows 7 59 contem seconds ago
cw
1
1.55 Windows 10 59 contem seconds ago
Pking_cda
2
1.59 Linux 4.4.0-59-generic 59 contem seconds ago
TueRens
3
1.52 Windows 7 59 contem seconds ago
biffhero
1
0.87 Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 59 contem seconds ago
Data
16
1.60 Windows 10 59 contem seconds ago
Data
16
1.24 Windows 10 59 contem seconds ago
JojoM
6
1.20 Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 59 contem seconds ago
velislav
3
2.24 Linux 4.13.0-17-generic 59 contem seconds ago
mibere
5
2.03 Linux 4.9.0-4-amd64 59 contem seconds ago
Garf
7
1.60 Linux 4.13.5-1-MANJARO 59 contem seconds ago
ianh2105
10
1.93 Windows 7 59 contem seconds ago
mm7
2
1.49 Linux 4.9.0-4-amd64 59 contem seconds ago
fastgm
11
1.69 Windows 10 59 contem seconds ago
anst
4
2.25 Windows 10 59 contem seconds ago
sg4032
23
1.17 Linux 4.13.0-17-generic 59 contem seconds ago
solarlight
3
2.83 Windows 10 59 contem seconds ago
Allonautilus
3
1.21 Linux 3.19.8-100.fc20.x86_64 59 contem seconds ago
Thanar
3
1.29 Windows 7 59 contem seconds ago
dew
4
1.91 Windows 10 59 contem seconds ago
mibere
5
2.03 Linux 4.9.0-4-amd64 59 contem seconds ago
mibere
5
2.03 Linux 4.9.0-4-amd64 59 contem seconds ago
mibere
5
2.03 Linux 4.9.0-4-amd64 59 contem seconds ago
mibere
5
2.03 Linux 4.9.0-4-amd64 59 contem seconds ago
SC
3
2.12 Linux 4.2.0-42-generic 59 contem seconds ago
mibere
5
1.97 Linux 4.9.0-4-amd64 59 contem seconds ago
mibere
5
2.07 Linux 4.9.0-4-amd64 59 master seconds ago
mibere
5
1.93 Linux 4.9.0-4-amd64 59 master seconds ago
CSU_Dynasty
11
1.46 Windows 7 59 OtherChecks seconds ago
mhoram
1
2.36 Linux 4.9.0-4-amd64 59 OtherChecks seconds ago
pb00067
2
2.26 Windows 10 59 OtherChecks 31 minutes ago
LuigiT
2
1.92 Windows 10 59 OtherChecks seconds ago
leszek
7
1.04 Windows 7 59 OtherChecks seconds ago
velislav
1
2.43 Linux 4.4.0-101-generic 59 OtherChecks seconds ago
gri
1
2.34 Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 59 OtherChecks seconds ago
bcross
3
1.04 Windows 10 59 OtherChecks seconds ago
racerschmacer
1
1.87 Windows 10 59 OtherChecks seconds ago
10-12-17 SC context diff
LLR: 1.35 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 143613 W: 25843 L: 26016 D: 91754
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 2, this time a simplification.
09-12-17 II contem diff
LLR: -0.17 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 76497 W: 9888 L: 9700 D: 56909
sprt @ 60+0.6 th 1 LTC: Take 2: Larger change
11-12-17 sg queen_mobility diff
LLR: -0.38 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 478 W: 76 L: 90 D: 312
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Less queen mobility if only diagonal or non-diagonal moves exists.
08-12-17 Gu OtherChecks diff
LLR: -1.58 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 36629 W: 4654 L: 4639 D: 27336
sprt @ 60+0.6 th 1 LTC for ElbertoOne Other check merge idea with 0-4 bounds (will it better at 60+0.6 !?)
03-12-17 sg master diff
ELO: 39.90 +-1.5 (95%) LOS: 100.0%
Total: 39651 W: 6327 L: 1793 D: 31531
40000 @ 180+1.8 th 1 VLTC for comparison (see https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/fishcooking/A78xxpyU8dI). Regression test until "Use constexpr when makes sense" (low throughput)
10-12-17 fa tuneSW diff
19448/20000 iterations
39843/40000 games played
40000 @ 20+0.2 th 1 Tune session for Shelter Weakness

Finished - 22338 tests

10-12-17 vd fixStaticEval diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 125389 W: 22237 L: 22605 D: 80547
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 stc, make staticEval static again.
11-12-17 vd scoreDraw diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 35273 W: 6300 L: 6276 D: 22697
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 stc
11-12-17 pb rook_pin diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 18107 W: 3356 L: 3403 D: 11348
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Allow bishop check attacks through opponent rooks. Similar to http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5a26c78d0ebc590ccbb8b866 but little more accurate. Test against passed Simplify other checks
11-12-17 vd scoreDraw diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 12267 W: 2137 L: 2210 D: 7920
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 stc, take 2
11-12-17 El pawnEndgames diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 40976 W: 7346 L: 7363 D: 26267
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Try to simplify a bit more. Scheduled a [0,4] test as requested.
10-12-17 SC passedSquares diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 89131 W: 16378 L: 16228 D: 56525
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Replace two ifs by a compact formula. Less LOCs, slightly more complex formula, using [0,4]
11-12-17 Ro SOC3 diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 20292 W: 3796 L: 3570 D: 12926
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 2nd try to improve, against latest green LTC
09-12-17 II tempo diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 84768 W: 15355 L: 15223 D: 54190
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Is Stockfish ready for higher tempo? (an alternative / check for running LTC test)
10-12-17 II stempo diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 18955 W: 2367 L: 2424 D: 14164
sprt @ 60+0.6 th 1 LTC: Define Tempo as Score.
10-12-17 sg check_threats diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 26791 W: 4838 L: 4849 D: 17104
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Try now safe knight check threats.
10-12-17 sg check_threats diff
LLR: -2.94 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 13787 W: 2475 L: 2541 D: 8771
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Double bonus
10-12-17 vd nullQS2 diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 21490 W: 3962 L: 3995 D: 13533
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 stc, take 3
10-12-17 vd scorePSQ diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 7723 W: 1338 L: 1430 D: 4955
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 stc, take 3
10-12-17 vd scorePSQ diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 10749 W: 1939 L: 2018 D: 6792
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 stc, take 2
10-12-17 SC context2 diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 11140 W: 1935 L: 2111 D: 7094
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Go a further step towards reductions linearization.
10-12-17 vd nullQS2 diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 2116 W: 352 L: 470 D: 1294
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 stc, take 5
10-12-17 vd scorePSQ diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 303 W: 14 L: 136 D: 153
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 stc
10-12-17 SC checkExt diff
LLR: -2.94 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 8833 W: 1507 L: 1678 D: 5648
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 4, be careful only with capture checks.
10-12-17 Vo lmrt4 diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 8190 W: 1441 L: 1531 D: 5218
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 stc
10-12-17 SC checkExt diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 18910 W: 3329 L: 3518 D: 12063
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 3.
10-12-17 vd nullQS2 diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 2194 W: 331 L: 446 D: 1417
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 stc, take 4, fixed
10-12-17 vd nullQS2 diff
LLR: -0.27 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 73 W: 12 L: 24 D: 37
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 stc, take 4
10-12-17 II stempo diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 9323 W: 1749 L: 1585 D: 5989
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Define Tempo as Score.
10-12-17 vd nullQS diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 2545 W: 415 L: 530 D: 1600
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 stc, take 2
10-12-17 vd nullQS diff
LLR: -2.97 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 1594 W: 245 L: 365 D: 984
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 stc
10-12-17 sn check_extension2 diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 49195 W: 8855 L: 9096 D: 31244
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Simplify check extension condition (2/2)
09-12-17 Vo ttCaptureLMR diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 45560 W: 8263 L: 8194 D: 29103
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 stc
10-12-17 SC tacticalMode diff
LLR: -2.97 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 23371 W: 4223 L: 4249 D: 14899
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 2.
10-12-17 jo ext_iter6 diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 13755 W: 2424 L: 2491 D: 8840
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Always extend checks close to the root. Take 2.
10-12-17 sn check_extension2 diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 35635 W: 6319 L: 6536 D: 22780
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Simplify check extension condition (1/2)
10-12-17 jo ext_iter6 diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 19794 W: 3558 L: 3599 D: 12637
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Extend checks during the first iterations even with bad SEE. Take 1.
10-12-17 Vo ttExact diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 25680 W: 3187 L: 3269 D: 19224
sprt @ 60+0.6 th 1 Use [0, 4] bounds...per Marco's request.
10-12-17 SC checkExt diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 12308 W: 2108 L: 2285 D: 7915
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 It did surprisingly well. Give it a second try.
09-12-17 Ro SimpleOtherCheck2 diff
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 26812 W: 3575 L: 3463 D: 19774
sprt @ 60+0.6 th 1 LTC for Take 2: use a popcount
10-12-17 Le BishOppos diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 28252 W: 5014 L: 5075 D: 18163
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Tunes from SPSA test. Bishoppos w/o pieces: passpawn =< 1 SFact19, else 45. Whatever with pieces, 44.
10-12-17 Ro SimpleChecks diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 18827 W: 3307 L: 3400 D: 12120
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Is this a better version take 2(I forgot to comment one line)
10-12-17 sn check_extension2 diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 7408 W: 1225 L: 1393 D: 4790
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Simplify check extension condition (3/2)
09-12-17 SC checkExt diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 29342 W: 5094 L: 5299 D: 18949
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 A far fetched attempt
09-12-17 Ro SimpleChecks diff
LLR: -0.15 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 842 W: 151 L: 156 D: 535
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Is this a better version ? Test STC [0, 4]
09-12-17 Le Whole_bishOppos_tuned diff
19665/20000 iterations
40000/40000 games played
40000 @ 10+0.1 th 1 Tunning bishoppos with pieces
09-12-17 Vo captureSeriesLMR diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 6365 W: 1113 L: 1211 D: 4041
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 stc
09-12-17 Vo ttExactLMR diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 26837 W: 4867 L: 4878 D: 17092
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Test this against passed ttExact patch...
09-12-17 Vo lmrt3b diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 20896 W: 3723 L: 3760 D: 13413
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 ver 3b
09-12-17 SC pawnEndgames diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 12875 W: 2375 L: 2445 D: 8055
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 2.
09-12-17 Ro SimpleOtherCheck diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 125304 W: 22761 L: 22819 D: 79724
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 simpler other checks, removing three conditional and using some kingDanger units.
09-12-17 jo lmr_iter4 diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 1949 W: 311 L: 429 D: 1209
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Limit reduction during the first iterations. Another try.
09-12-17 SC negativeReductions diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 4220 W: 698 L: 863 D: 2659
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Do we really need to cap reductions at 0?
09-12-17 SC pawnEndgames diff
LLR: -0.25 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 5193 W: 525 L: 521 D: 4147
sprt @ 60+0.6 th 1 Extend king moves in pawn endgames. LTC speculative to understand scaling
09-12-17 II contem diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 25041 W: 4710 L: 4467 D: 15864
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 2: Larger change
09-12-17 sg check_threats diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 24714 W: 4434 L: 4454 D: 15826
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Now add bonus to kingDanger (fixed bench)