Stockfish Testing Queue

Finished - 1016 tests

16-07-29 Elb blocked_p2 diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 11592 W: 2199 L: 2274 D: 7119
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 2: use mstembera's yellow patch (http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/576f4e450ebc5972faa163c3) as base with factor 4 instead of 8
16-07-28 Elb blocked_p2 diff
LLR: -2.97 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 21969 W: 4149 L: 4179 D: 13641
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Blocked pawns in evaluate_initiative
16-07-11 Elb lmr_cap diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 23880 W: 4509 L: 4583 D: 14788
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 LMR parameter tweak
16-07-11 Elb lmr_cap diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 7821 W: 1434 L: 1526 D: 4861
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 LMR parameter tweak: take 2
16-07-09 Elb lmrk diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 18831 W: 3527 L: 3571 D: 11733
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 LMR for killers: take 2
16-07-09 Elb lmrk diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 6498 W: 1201 L: 1299 D: 3998
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Another attempt at LMR for killers
16-07-08 Elb futilityWin diff
ELO: -0.90 +-4.9 (95%) LOS: 36.0%
Total: 5000 W: 654 L: 667 D: 3679
5000 @ 60+0.6 th 1 A quick check if this patch (http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/576fd3480ebc5972faa163ee) scales better on LTC.
16-07-07 Elb end_draw4 diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 80268 W: 11705 L: 11539 D: 57024
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Another try at this: only look at almost symmetrical pawn chains with 1 pawn difference.
16-07-07 Elb end_draw5 diff
LLR: -2.97 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 16645 W: 2393 L: 2454 D: 11798
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Last try in this series: almost symmetrical pawn chains in end games
16-07-04 Elb end_draw2 diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 119379 W: 17661 L: 17351 D: 84367
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 2: cover all cases where we have symmetrical pawn chains. Note: take 1 (end_draw) is put on the back burner for now (max. 128K games).
16-07-06 Elb end_draw3 diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 46536 W: 6790 L: 6744 D: 33002
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 3: exclude opposite bishops endgames
16-06-30 Elb end_draw diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 132923 W: 13458 L: 13227 D: 106238
sprt @ 60+0.6 th 1 LTC: My take on drawish endgames with equal material and compact pawn chains.
16-06-29 Elb end_draw diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 39415 W: 5870 L: 5609 D: 27936
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 My take on drawish endgames with equal material and compact pawn chains.
16-06-24 Elb king_prox diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 20563 W: 2957 L: 3004 D: 14602
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 2: Give bonus for the strong side for close proximity of the kings in endgames.
16-06-24 Elb king_prox diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 23281 W: 3441 L: 3477 D: 16363
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Give bonus for the strong side for close proximity of the kings in endgames.
16-06-23 Elb king_central diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 28735 W: 4192 L: 4209 D: 20334
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 3: give penalty when king is on the edge of the board in rook endgames
16-06-23 Elb king_central2 diff
LLR: -2.97 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 5488 W: 762 L: 863 D: 3863
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Try a more general approach to king centralization in endgames
16-06-22 Elb king_central diff
LLR: -2.94 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 44345 W: 6533 L: 6493 D: 31319
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 2: small bonus for centralized king in rook endgame.
16-06-22 Elb king_central diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 22164 W: 3272 L: 3312 D: 15580
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Give small bonus to centralized king in rook endgame.
16-06-22 Elb pawn_chain_opp diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 17876 W: 2533 L: 2590 D: 12753
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Opposing pawn chains in rook endings are drawish. Also include minors.
16-06-21 Elb pawn_chain_opp diff
LLR: -2.97 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 17552 W: 2507 L: 2565 D: 12480
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Opposing pawn chains in rook endings are drawish. Improved logic for another try at this.
16-06-21 Elb rook_end2 diff
LLR: -2.25 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 2705 W: 402 L: 485 D: 1818
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Final try at scale factor for rook endings
16-06-21 Elb rook_end2 diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 8189 W: 1169 L: 1260 D: 5760
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Another try at adding scale factor for certain rook endgames. Use 8 moves book.
16-06-20 Elb rook_end2 diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 10573 W: 1521 L: 1603 D: 7449
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 3: Add scale factor for certain rook endgames. Use 8 moves book.
16-06-20 Elb rook_end2 diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 31992 W: 4711 L: 4716 D: 22565
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 2: Add scale factor for certain rook endgames. Use 8 moves book.
16-06-19 Elb rook_end diff
LLR: -2.94 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 29975 W: 4449 L: 4460 D: 21066
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Inspired by last night's SF vs. Gull game, add scale factor for certain rook endgames. Use 8 moves book.
16-06-17 Elb lmr_cut4B` diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 48363 W: 6611 L: 6528 D: 35224
sprt @ 60+0.6 th 1 LTC: Take 2: on IID we should not always search with cutNode = true. Test as bugfix (see also the discussion).
16-06-17 Elb lmr_gc diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 9674 W: 1297 L: 1383 D: 6994
sprt @ 60+0.6 th 1 LTC: Make cutNodes reduction dependent on history
16-06-17 Elb lmr_gc diff
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 15288 W: 2911 L: 2719 D: 9658
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Make cutNodes reduction dependent on history
16-06-17 Elb lmr_gc diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 10319 W: 1874 L: 1955 D: 6490
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 My take on VoyagerOne's idea of not increasing reduction too much when giving check.
16-06-11 Elb lmr_cut4 diff
LLR: -1.00 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 35056 W: 4843 L: 4942 D: 25271
sprt @ 60+0.6 th 1 LTC: Simplification attempt for cut nodes
16-06-14 Elb lmr_cut4B diff
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 163974 W: 30744 L: 30874 D: 102356
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 2: on IID we should not always search with cutNode = true. Test as bugfix (see also the discussion).
16-06-16 Elb init_blockp diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 6080 W: 1105 L: 1205 D: 3770
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Give penalty when strong side has a lot of blocked pawns. Last try unless this take performs significantly better.
16-06-16 Elb init_blockp diff
LLR: -2.94 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 8424 W: 1548 L: 1637 D: 5239
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 3: Exclude blocked pawns from initiative calculation
16-06-15 Elb init_blockp diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 8534 W: 1577 L: 1666 D: 5291
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 2: Exclude blocked pawns from initiative calculation
16-06-15 Elb init_blockp diff
LLR: -2.97 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 6270 W: 1071 L: 1170 D: 4029
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Exclude blocked pawns from initiative calculation
16-06-13 Elb lmr_cut4B diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 31750 W: 5926 L: 5973 D: 19851
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 In IID we should not expect a PvNode to be a cut node. Resubmitted with [0,4] bounds.
16-06-10 Elb lmr_cut4 diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 68894 W: 12889 L: 12852 D: 43153
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Simplification attempt for cut nodes
16-06-10 Elb rHist3 diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 17327 W: 3192 L: 3289 D: 10846
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 3: rHist parameter tweak
16-06-10 Elb rHist diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 50040 W: 6819 L: 6832 D: 36389
sprt @ 60+0.6 th 1 LTC: rHist parameter tweak
16-06-09 Elb rHist diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 86249 W: 16219 L: 15762 D: 54268
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 rHist parameter tweak
16-06-09 Elb rHist diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 7831 W: 1401 L: 1531 D: 4899
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 2: I would like to test this variant of the rHist parameter as well
16-06-07 Elb lmr_killer3 diff
LLR: -2.97 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 35195 W: 6577 L: 6550 D: 22068
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Re-run of an old idea for killers, but this time with more decrease in reduction. Test against passed patches.
16-06-06 Elb lmr_cut3B diff
ELO: -1.32 +-5.0 (95%) LOS: 30.2%
Total: 5000 W: 661 L: 680 D: 3659
5000 @ 60+0.6 th 1 A second (and final) quick check to see if there is more ELO gain possible against passed test http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/57555b570ebc59029919b260
16-06-06 Elb lmr_cut3B diff
ELO: -13.10 +-11.4 (95%) LOS: 1.2%
Total: 902 W: 97 L: 131 D: 674
5000 @ 60+0.6 th 1 A quick check to see if there is more ELO gain possible against passed test http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/57555b570ebc59029919b260
16-06-06 Elb lmr_cut3 diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 10353 W: 1493 L: 1317 D: 7543
sprt @ 60+0.6 th 1 LTC: Take 3: my bet is that decrease reduction works best at STC and increase reduction scales better at LTC.
16-06-05 Elb lmr_cut3 diff
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 60165 W: 11519 L: 11149 D: 37497
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 3: my bet is that decrease reduction works best at STC and increase reduction scales better at LTC.
16-06-04 Elb lmr_cut3 diff
LLR: -3.29 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 40284 W: 5313 L: 5371 D: 29600
sprt @ 60+0.6 th 1 LTC: Decrease reduction more
16-06-05 Elb lmr_cut3 diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 24947 W: 4585 L: 4656 D: 15706
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 2: maybe a more drastic decrease in reduction will scale better
16-06-04 Elb lmr_cut3 diff
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 24696 W: 4627 L: 4385 D: 15684
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Decrease reduction more