Stockfish Testing Queue

Pending - 3 tests 0.0 hrs

11-12-17 SC context diff
LLR: -1.25 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 45862 W: 8256 L: 8401 D: 29205
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 2 is going slowly. Try some variation of parameter to see whether we can pass more quickly. -25%. Take 3.
10-12-17 SC context diff
LLR: 0.48 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 152394 W: 27369 L: 27603 D: 97422
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 2, this time a simplification.
10-12-17 SC context diff
LLR: -1.35 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 23000 W: 4164 L: 4157 D: 14679
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 1. Testing with [0,4] as I cannot decide between [0,5] and [-3, 1]

Active - 0 tests

Finished - 953 tests

15-12-17 SC fields01 diff
LLR: -2.97 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 16407 W: 2919 L: 2975 D: 10513
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 2.
14-12-17 SC fields02 diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 13898 W: 2466 L: 2532 D: 8900
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Give a direct boost for uncontested pawn space.
14-12-17 SC fields01 diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 7452 W: 1341 L: 1435 D: 4676
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Try to evaluate space occupied by pawns.
14-12-17 SC bishopActivity diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 7261 W: 1282 L: 1376 D: 4603
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Suggestion by Rocky, take 2.
03-12-17 SC optimism diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 34218 W: 6159 L: 6139 D: 21920
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 9. (more or less opposite of take 8).
13-12-17 SC bishopActivity diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 7304 W: 1285 L: 1379 D: 4640
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Easiest possible help with bishop activity.
12-12-17 SC context diff
LLR: -2.94 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 17561 W: 3154 L: 3204 D: 11203
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 3.
12-12-17 SC context diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 13345 W: 2402 L: 2470 D: 8473
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 2.
12-12-17 SC context diff
LLR: -2.97 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 7718 W: 1376 L: 1469 D: 4873
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 A Elo gain attempt.
12-12-17 SC context diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 26070 W: 3254 L: 3435 D: 19381
sprt @ 60+0.6 th 1 And +25%, take 4. LTC
11-12-17 SC context diff
LLR: 4.24 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 22933 W: 4291 L: 4105 D: 14537
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 And +25%, take 4.
11-12-17 SC passedSquares diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 15662 W: 2852 L: 2955 D: 9855
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 2
11-12-17 SC passedSquares2 diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 9662 W: 1695 L: 1779 D: 6188
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Determine attacked square more precisely.
10-12-17 SC passedSquares diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 89131 W: 16378 L: 16228 D: 56525
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Replace two ifs by a compact formula. Less LOCs, slightly more complex formula, using [0,4]
10-12-17 SC context2 diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 11140 W: 1935 L: 2111 D: 7094
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Go a further step towards reductions linearization.
10-12-17 SC checkExt diff
LLR: -2.94 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 8833 W: 1507 L: 1678 D: 5648
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 4, be careful only with capture checks.
10-12-17 SC checkExt diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 18910 W: 3329 L: 3518 D: 12063
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 3.
10-12-17 SC tacticalMode diff
LLR: -2.97 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 23371 W: 4223 L: 4249 D: 14899
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 2.
10-12-17 SC checkExt diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 12308 W: 2108 L: 2285 D: 7915
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 It did surprisingly well. Give it a second try.
09-12-17 SC checkExt diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 29342 W: 5094 L: 5299 D: 18949
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 A far fetched attempt
09-12-17 SC pawnEndgames diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 12875 W: 2375 L: 2445 D: 8055
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 2.
09-12-17 SC negativeReductions diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 4220 W: 698 L: 863 D: 2659
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Do we really need to cap reductions at 0?
09-12-17 SC pawnEndgames diff
LLR: -0.25 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 5193 W: 525 L: 521 D: 4147
sprt @ 60+0.6 th 1 Extend king moves in pawn endgames. LTC speculative to understand scaling
08-12-17 SC optimism diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 6305 W: 1054 L: 1152 D: 4099
sprt @ 5+0.05 th 5 How would perform optimism in multi thread? Low throughput.
08-12-17 SC pawnEndgames diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 44418 W: 8352 L: 8284 D: 27782
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Extend king moves in pawn endgames.
08-12-17 SC tacticalMode diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 35917 W: 6494 L: 6466 D: 22957
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Fix init.
05-12-17 SC noProtector diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 5631 W: 970 L: 1071 D: 3590
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Fixed bench.
05-12-17 SC optimism diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 13153 W: 2434 L: 2503 D: 8216
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Add directly to stat score.
05-12-17 SC trackPawns diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 5034 W: 840 L: 944 D: 3250
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 2.
04-12-17 SC optimism diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 57368 W: 10456 L: 10336 D: 36576
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Tuned values.
04-12-17 SC trackPawns diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 27320 W: 4970 L: 4978 D: 17372
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Reduce positions with opposite bishops if not so many changes in structure are happening.
03-12-17 SC optimismTune diff
31202/40000 iterations
63793/80000 games played
80000 @ 10+0.1 th 1 Try to tune from yellow to green.
02-12-17 SC optimism diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 67442 W: 12252 L: 12090 D: 43100
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 No positive thoroughness. Take 6.
03-12-17 SC pawnEndgames diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 23780 W: 4251 L: 4449 D: 15080
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Similar version to original, with suggestions by Joost. Testing as a simplification.
03-12-17 SC optimism diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 39147 W: 7130 L: 7088 D: 24929
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Try to improve on the two yellow attempts. Take 7.
03-12-17 SC optimism diff
LLR: -2.97 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 26129 W: 4666 L: 4681 D: 16782
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 8.
03-12-17 SC pawnEndgames diff
LLR: -1.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 17036 W: 2355 L: 2375 D: 12306
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Skip early pruning in pawn endgames.
02-12-17 SC optimism diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 29824 W: 5464 L: 5461 D: 18899
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 It seems sensitive, give it some more try. Take 4.
02-12-17 SC optimism diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 24516 W: 4481 L: 4501 D: 15534
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 No negative thoroughness. Take 5.
02-12-17 SC optimism diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 19503 W: 3491 L: 3533 D: 12479
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 3.
02-12-17 SC optimism diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 13907 W: 2520 L: 2586 D: 8801
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Be more thorough if ahead.
02-12-17 SC optimism diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 7521 W: 1272 L: 1365 D: 4884
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Be more thorough if behind.
24-11-17 SC redThreadsMsb diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 13142 W: 2199 L: 2269 D: 8674
sprt @ 5+0.05 th 5 The redThread patch http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5a0b43cd0ebc590ccbb8aaf0 is struggling at 1.05 [-0.86,3.13] (95%). Try a variation in which threads with same quality experience the same reductions. I put the other test on hold.
29-11-17 SC scalePawns diff
LLR: -1.42 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 15783 W: 1407 L: 1424 D: 12952
sprt @ 60+0.6 th 1 Try the opposite of the -6 Elo attempt. Would this scale good at LTC with 8 moves book? Low to, will stop when the trend is clear.
28-11-17 SC scalePawns diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 19159 W: 3390 L: 3434 D: 12335
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Opposite of last bad attempt (on top of yellow patch).
28-11-17 SC scalePawns diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 19751 W: 3527 L: 3568 D: 12656
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Use only strong side for opposite bishops path.
27-11-17 SC scalePawns diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 33446 W: 6113 L: 6095 D: 21238
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 And only for phalanxes.
27-11-17 SC scalePawns diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 36034 W: 6537 L: 6509 D: 22988
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Try the opposite of the -6 Elo attempt.
27-11-17 SC scalePawns diff
LLR: -2.97 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 14529 W: 2580 L: 2644 D: 9305
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Can we improve using only strong side in the general case?
27-11-17 SC scalePawns diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 11539 W: 2032 L: 2108 D: 7399
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 The test with opposite bishops is going very strong. Is it using the idea also for opposite bishops alone with a lot of pawns even better?