Stockfish Testing Queue

Pending - 0 tests 0.0 hrs

None

Active - 0 tests

Finished - 16 tests

22-04-17 Se no_apex_bonus diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 37211 W: 6683 L: 6904 D: 23624
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Can apex pawn bonus be retired? horst.prack, recheck bench. It is correct.
22-04-17 Se no_apex_bonus diff
LLR: -0.42 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 1272 W: 231 L: 256 D: 785
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Can apex pawn bons be retired?
18-04-17 Se connected diff
LLR: -2.94 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 4307 W: 753 L: 860 D: 2694
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Put adding bonus for connected under "else".
20-12-16 Se threefold_opt2 diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 31875 W: 5731 L: 5721 D: 20423
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 I want to check if this version is better than the one in pull request #925. Test as [0,5] this time.
14-12-16 Se threefold_syzygy diff
ELO: -1.36 +-2.9 (95%) LOS: 17.8%
Total: 20000 W: 3528 L: 3606 D: 12866
20000 @ 10+0.1 th 1 Test syzygy's idea against my original idea. See pull request #925. (Note: root key can not be zeroed, its real value is used.)
12-12-16 Se threefold_opt diff
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 36775 W: 4739 L: 4639 D: 27397
sprt @ 60+0.6 th 1 LTC. Optimized version of my previous solution. Testing as a bugfix: [-3.00,1.00].
12-12-16 Se threefold_opt diff
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 47744 W: 8537 L: 8461 D: 30746
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Optimized version of my previous solution. Testing as a bugfix: [-3.00,1.00].
19-09-16 Se space_threshhold diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 12651 W: 2208 L: 2321 D: 8122
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Tweak space evaluation threshold.
01-09-16 Se threefold_precalculatio diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 46936 W: 8838 L: 8759 D: 29339
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Threefold repetition detection using precalculation. (I tested similar idea long ago, but want to retest it on the current codebase.)
29-08-16 Se threefold_repetition diff
LLR: -2.94 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 22730 W: 4272 L: 4298 D: 14160
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Threefold repetition detection. Fixes the bug with erroneous 2-fold rep.
09-11-15 Se prev_moves_3fold diff
LLR: -2.97 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 34676 W: 5205 L: 5199 D: 24272
sprt @ 60+0.4 th 1 LTC. Passed STC in http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/563fb46f0ebc59227df1710b Code comments changed, otherwise same code.
09-11-15 Se prev_moves_3fold diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 44117 W: 8650 L: 8578 D: 26889
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Improved version of http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/563fb46f0ebc59227df1710b (green). Leaves old behaviour for the root position to avoid unnecessary search cycles.
08-11-15 Se prev_moves_3fold diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 52353 W: 10499 L: 10133 D: 31721
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Implement a correct 3-fold repetition detection for previous (i.e. before-root) moves.
30-10-15 Se cutoff_time diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 16881 W: 3309 L: 3360 D: 10212
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Suggested by user IIvec. Same as the previous two yellow tests, but with divisor 5.
30-10-15 Se cutoff_time_div8 diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 32054 W: 6189 L: 6173 D: 19692
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Same as previous yellow "cutoff_time", but with divisor 8 instead of 10. Let's see if it is better.
29-10-15 Se cutoff_time diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 32866 W: 6294 L: 6275 D: 20297
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 This is my suggestion to prevent losses on time. It uses a formula for cutoffTime so that check_time() will stop searching before it is too late even when timer thread is lagging. See also my posts in this thread: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/fishcooking/kPNocZQkW-4