Stockfish Testing Queue

Pending - 0 tests 0.0 hrs

None

Active - 0 tests

Finished - 462 tests

17-08-17 pb smp_pickbest3 diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 20486 W: 3389 L: 3430 D: 13667
sprt @ 5+0.05 th 5 Take 2: Ignore selective depth, just replace completedDepth with nominalDepth (=effective used rootDepth for best move).
16-08-17 pb smp_pickbest3 diff
LLR: -2.97 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 19688 W: 2704 L: 2756 D: 14228
sprt @ 20+0.2 th 3 LTC: Trying to further improve pickbest-logic by comparing nominalDepth (=effective used rootDepth for best move) instead of completedDepth.
16-08-17 pb smp_pickbest3 diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 4878 W: 940 L: 795 D: 3143
sprt @ 5+0.05 th 3 Trying to further improve pickbest-logic by comparing nominalDepth (=effective used rootDepth for best move) instead of completedDepth.
24-07-17 pb smp_pickbest2 diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 173469 W: 22104 L: 21671 D: 129694
sprt @ 20+0.2 th 5 Take2, LTC
26-07-17 pb smp_swap_best diff
LLR: -0.01 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 88 W: 16 L: 16 D: 56
sprt @ 5+0.05 th 3 SMP: On helpers bring new best rootmove immediately to the front so that pickbest-logic can pick them even if their search is uncompleted
17-07-17 pb smp_pickbest2 diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 83333 W: 13769 L: 13320 D: 56244
sprt @ 5+0.05 th 5 Take2, taking advantage of empty framework for another try
17-07-17 pb smp_pickbest diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 44067 W: 6987 L: 7004 D: 30076
sprt @ 5+0.05 th 7 Depth condition in pick-best-thread is there just for safety reasons, so relax it a bit.
17-07-17 pb probcut diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 19211 W: 3457 L: 3500 D: 12254
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take2, Probcut-captures: don't consider moves with negative see
17-07-17 pb probcut diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 7654 W: 1328 L: 1421 D: 4905
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Probcut-captures: just consider moves with positive see
13-07-17 pb singular_detection diff
LLR: -2.97 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 53338 W: 9659 L: 9558 D: 34121
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Don't shallow prune moves with negative see while probing for singular extension
14-07-17 pb singular_detection diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 26598 W: 4806 L: 4818 D: 16974
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 4
13-07-17 pb singular_detection diff
LLR: -3.10 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 13611 W: 2333 L: 2407 D: 8871
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 3
13-07-17 pb singular_detection diff
LLR: -2.97 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 10295 W: 1801 L: 1883 D: 6611
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 2: be more cautious with see-pruning while singular move detection
12-07-17 pb shallow_depth_singular diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 10219 W: 1800 L: 1882 D: 6537
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 4
12-07-17 pb shallow_pruning_neg_see diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 17481 W: 3080 L: 3131 D: 11270
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Shallow depth prune loosing quite moves
02-07-17 pb shallow_depth_singular diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 70456 W: 9044 L: 8936 D: 52476
sprt @ 60+0.6 th 1 Ltc Take 3
01-07-17 pb shallow_depth_singular diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 41288 W: 7563 L: 7263 D: 26462
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 3
01-07-17 pb shallow_depth_singular diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 23997 W: 4300 L: 4323 D: 15374
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 2
30-06-17 pb shallow_depth_singular diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 42191 W: 7702 L: 7647 D: 26842
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 At depths 8,9,10,11 also prune moves with negative SEE when ttMove was singular extended
29-06-17 pb capture_lmr diff
LLR: -2.94 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 10844 W: 1851 L: 1930 D: 7063
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 3
28-06-17 pb capture_lmr diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 41610 W: 7529 L: 7477 D: 26604
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 2: another bugfix. Apologies for the prior tries I had to stop.
28-06-17 pb capture_lmr diff
LLR: -0.47 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 1608 W: 292 L: 305 D: 1011
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 2: bugfix & fixed logic
28-06-17 pb capture_lmr diff
LLR: -0.09 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 182 W: 30 L: 33 D: 119
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 2, bugfix
28-06-17 pb capture_lmr diff
LLR: 0.14 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 6397 W: 1173 L: 1140 D: 4084
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 2: Reduct captures by 1 (or 2) plies when see-value results smaller than one of ttMove-capture but moveCountPruning isn't reached yet.
27-06-17 pb good_capture_threshold2 diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 23448 W: 4173 L: 4199 D: 15076
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 2: even reduce more the captures considered 'bad' (fixed logic)
27-06-17 pb capture_lmr diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 8613 W: 1488 L: 1577 D: 5548
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Do LMR on captures having a smaller see-value than ttMove-capture
27-06-17 pb good_capture_threshold2 diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 6905 W: 1147 L: 1243 D: 4515
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 3
27-06-17 pb good_capture_threshold diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 5712 W: 1009 L: 1110 D: 3593
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Adapt good capture see-threshold according ttCapture see-value
26-06-17 pb relax_refresh diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 12303 W: 2208 L: 2281 D: 7814
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Relax tt-generation-refresh by doing it expllicitly only in crucial points. Bench changes at higher deeps.
26-06-17 pb pruning_capture diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 22421 W: 4044 L: 4074 D: 14303
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Last try on this idea (fixed bench).
23-06-17 pb pruning_capture diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 28934 W: 5212 L: 5214 D: 18508
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 stc, fixed bench
23-06-17 pb singular_lmr diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 8668 W: 1554 L: 1642 D: 5472
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 4
22-06-17 pb singular_lmr diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 27990 W: 4888 L: 4896 D: 18206
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 3
22-06-17 pb singular_lmr diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 19370 W: 3428 L: 3471 D: 12471
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 2: Double reduce cut-nodes only if ttMove was singular extended
22-06-17 pb singular_lmr diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 6201 W: 1021 L: 1120 D: 4060
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Further LMR reduce other quiet moves, if ttCapture was singular extended. This had good results in a local stc test (W: 1733 L: 1630 D: 5856 [0.506]) so curious to see what the framework will say.
21-06-17 pb voyagerOne2 diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 6127 W: 1061 L: 1160 D: 3906
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Apply same logic to singularExtesions, fixed logic . Test on top and against VoyagerOne's passed patch
21-06-17 pb voyagerOne2 diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 7314 W: 1224 L: 1318 D: 4772
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Apply same logic to singularExtesions. Test on top and against VoyagerOne's passed patch
21-06-17 pb voyagerOne2 diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 14061 W: 2510 L: 2575 D: 8976
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Insurance. Test on top and against VoyagerOne's passed patch (fixed base bench).
19-06-17 pb quantised_windows diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 10519 W: 1896 L: 1976 D: 6647
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Experiment: quantised aspiration window (to even numbers). Can we obtain a higher tt-early-cutoff rate through that?
19-06-17 pb pinners2 diff
LLR: -2.94 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 5219 W: 924 L: 1027 D: 3268
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Bonus for pinners
13-06-17 pb smp_exp diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 5533 W: 815 L: 916 D: 3802
sprt @ 5+0.05 th 7 SMP experiment: helpers do divide late rootMoves by searching some of them at very shallow depth, hoping that the other helpers already wrote enough information to TT for those moves.
13-06-17 pb pvs_aspiration diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 8423 W: 1484 L: 1573 D: 5366
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 2
13-06-17 pb pvs_aspiration diff
LLR: -2.94 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 8886 W: 1580 L: 1667 D: 5639
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Aspiration: immediately research with wider window if first rootmove fails low (see chessprogramming 'PVS and Aspiration', approach B).
13-06-17 pb bishop_knight_ex diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 16541 W: 3029 L: 3083 D: 10429
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 3: On recapture, trade our bishop with knight (good capture), but not do it, if it's our last & opponent keeps the bishop pair.
13-06-17 pb bishop_knight_ex4 diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 6465 W: 1149 L: 1247 D: 4069
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 4: like take 3, but restrict it all to the recapture square.
12-06-17 pb bishop_knight_ex diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 20244 W: 2616 L: 2668 D: 14960
sprt @ 60+0.6 th 1 LTC: Take 2: Handle Bishop Knight trade as good-capture in dynamic situations (on recapture)
12-06-17 pb bishop_knight_ex diff
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 23347 W: 4369 L: 4143 D: 14835
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 2: Handle Bishop Knight trade as good-capture in dynamic situations (on recapture)
12-06-17 pb bishop_knight_ex diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 18785 W: 3409 L: 3454 D: 11922
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Sort Bishop-Knight exchange among quiet moves (with zero value)
09-06-17 pb aspiration5 diff
LLR: -2.97 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 18838 W: 3436 L: 3481 D: 11921
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 3
08-06-17 pb aspiration5 diff
LLR: -4.16 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 44959 W: 8114 L: 8099 D: 28746
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 2