Stockfish Testing Queue

Finished - 5228 tests

17-05-22 sg lmr_history2 diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 19386 W: 3479 L: 3569 D: 12338
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1
My 3/2 history patch failed yellow. perhaps not the history but the average decrease (-1660) of ss->history (more reductions) is the key. So lower the correction factor.
17-05-21 sg lmr_history2 diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 67113 W: 12426 L: 12262 D: 42425
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1
3/2 history weight
17-05-21 sg lmr_history diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 9226 W: 1613 L: 1699 D: 5914
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1
Half fmh2 weight
17-05-20 sg lmr_history2 diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 39509 W: 7210 L: 7231 D: 25068
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1
Instead for lmr only double history in stats update
17-05-20 sg lmr_history2 diff
LLR: -2.94 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 32876 W: 6036 L: 6079 D: 20761
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1
Double history weight with compensation
17-05-20 sg lmr_history2 diff
LLR: -2.97 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 23276 W: 4166 L: 4193 D: 14917
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1
Triple history weight for LMR
17-05-20 sg lmr_history2 diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 41789 W: 7678 L: 7624 D: 26487
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1
Double history weight for LMR
17-05-20 sg lmr_history diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 7083 W: 1200 L: 1295 D: 4588
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1
Double fmh2 weight for LMR
17-05-20 sg lmr_history diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 7316 W: 1258 L: 1352 D: 4706
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1
Double cmh weight for LMR
17-05-20 sg lmr_history2 diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 12886 W: 2303 L: 2373 D: 8210
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1
Double fmh weight for LMR
17-05-20 sg assault_ratio3 diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 12263 W: 2192 L: 2265 D: 7806
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1
use maximum
17-05-19 sg assault_ratio2 diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 10175 W: 1897 L: 1979 D: 6299
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1
Compensate to zero the mean of the attacker/defender diff
17-05-18 sg assault_ratio2 diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 14400 W: 2538 L: 2602 D: 9260
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1
Try another formula which is symmetric between attackers and defenders.
17-05-18 sg king_danger_tweak diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 25505 W: 4670 L: 4686 D: 16149
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1
Do some king danger calculations everytime
17-05-18 sg assault_ratio diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 21382 W: 3893 L: 3927 D: 13562
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1
Even lower scaling
17-05-18 sg assault_ratio diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 4608 W: 791 L: 897 D: 2920
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1
Try lower scaling
17-05-18 sg assault_ratio diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 2880 W: 469 L: 582 D: 1829
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1
Scale king danger according to the assault ratio.
17-05-17 sg eval_lmr diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 20113 W: 3555 L: 3595 D: 12963
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1
Use beta instead of alpha
17-05-17 sg eval_lmr diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 26421 W: 4726 L: 4739 D: 16956
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1
Add compensation
17-05-17 sg eval_lmr diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 14933 W: 2655 L: 2717 D: 9561
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1
Weight 32 failed yellow so try double up to weight 64
17-05-16 sg eval_lmr diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 15164 W: 2715 L: 2776 D: 9673
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1
Eval based lmr
17-05-16 sg eval_lmr diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 61148 W: 11101 L: 10966 D: 39081
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1
Increase weight to 32.
17-05-16 sg eval_lmr diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 25629 W: 4571 L: 4588 D: 16470
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1
Weight eval diff 8 times higher and clamp to [-20000...20000].
17-05-08 sg master diff
ELO: 20.25 +-1.6 (95%) LOS: 100.0%
Total: 40000 W: 5587 L: 3258 D: 31155
40000 @ 60+0.6 th 1
Regression test until "Linear Protector bonus by distance". This can be compared with the VLTC regression test.
17-05-12 sg qs_nullmove diff
LLR: -2.97 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 21450 W: 3808 L: 3843 D: 13799
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1
Do null move search only if static eval > alpha.
17-05-12 sg qs_nullmove diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 4553 W: 767 L: 873 D: 2913
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1
Do null move search only at first level of qsearch.
17-05-12 sg qs_nullmove diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 5886 W: 1036 L: 1136 D: 3714
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1
Use now minimum of null move search and static eval.
17-05-10 sg fix_wrong_tt_hit diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 68203 W: 12394 L: 12354 D: 43455
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1
Fix the usage of wrong tt hits in search. Read more in repo comment.
17-05-11 sg qs_nullmove diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 18415 W: 3325 L: 3372 D: 11718
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1
Fix bug. Forgot to correct my tempo to get the same eval as static eval if no good opponent move exists. Stop other test
17-05-11 sg qs_nullmove diff
LLR: -1.93 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 5136 W: 915 L: 975 D: 3246
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1
Try in qsearch a null move search to get a safer stand pat value (this recognize threats like hanging pieces)
17-05-10 sg quiets2 diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 8435 W: 1493 L: 1582 D: 5360
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1
Fix problem with triggered assert. See my comment here https://github.com/locutus2/Stockfish/compare/0c1f119...078aac2
17-05-10 sg quiets diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 15320 W: 2760 L: 2820 D: 9740
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1
Exclude quiet checks for negative stats update.
17-05-09 sg passed_pawn_break3 diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 56109 W: 10123 L: 10010 D: 35976
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1
Rewrite my last passed pawn break patch (see https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/1110) and add the case of a pawn break defended by two opponent pawns but also supported by an own pawn.
17-05-09 sg passed_pawn_break3 diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 41821 W: 7596 L: 7543 D: 26682
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1
An optimized version of my last try. Speedup 0.4%. Set other test to prio -1.
17-05-08 sg master diff
ELO: 20.12 +-1.9 (95%) LOS: 100.0%
Total: 40000 W: 7460 L: 5146 D: 27394
40000 @ 10+0.1 th 1
Regression test until "Linear Protector bonus by distance" @ STC for comparison (see https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/fishcooking/sn6zUU8uebs)
17-05-07 sg nullmove diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 17246 W: 3087 L: 3185 D: 10974
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1
No nullmove pruning in knight endgames
17-04-30 sg MinorBehindPawn diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 40227 W: 7307 L: 7261 D: 25659
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1
No MinorBehindPawn bonus if piece is behind an own passed pawn
17-05-03 sg MinorBehindPawn2 diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 32768 W: 5899 L: 5885 D: 20984
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1
Fix undefined behaviour. s+Up could be outside of the board. Combine DiscanX's and my yellow patch. http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5903c9810ebc59035df340b4 http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/590649db0ebc59035df34154
17-05-02 sg MinorBehindPawn2 diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 37567 W: 6727 L: 6693 D: 24147
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1
Half compensation
17-05-02 sg MinorBehindPawn2 diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 10727 W: 1868 L: 1948 D: 6911
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1
Now try it with compensation
17-04-30 sg MinorBehindPawn2 diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 65815 W: 11968 L: 11813 D: 42034
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1
No MinorBehindPawn bonus if piece is behind an opponent passed pawn. This removes overlap with passed pawn evaluation. No compensation.
17-04-30 sg MinorBehindPawn2 diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 19906 W: 3606 L: 3646 D: 12654
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1
No MinorBehindPawn bonus if piece is behind an own pawn which is not defended by a pawn
17-04-30 sg MinorBehindPawn diff
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 11951 W: 2166 L: 2240 D: 7545
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1
No MinorBehindPawn bonus if piece is attacked by a pawn
17-04-28 sg passed_pawn_break2 diff
LLR: 3.34 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 33928 W: 4544 L: 4300 D: 25084
sprt @ 60+0.6 th 1
LTC: Version of my last try with half eval (+ fix of assert in evaluate_passed_pawns). Set prio to -1 to wait for the other version.
17-04-29 sg passed_pawn_break3 diff
LLR: -0.02 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 18653 W: 3367 L: 3289 D: 11997
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1
Try only quarter bonus
17-04-27 sg passed_pawn_break diff
LLR: -1.08 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 69516 W: 9014 L: 8833 D: 51669
sprt @ 60+0.6 th 1
LTC: Bonus for pawn sacrifice which creates an advanced passed pawn
17-04-28 sg passed_pawn_break2 diff
LLR: -1.08 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 30872 W: 5648 L: 5562 D: 19662
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1
LTC struggles, so try some variations of this idea.
17-04-28 sg passed_pawn_break2 diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 16752 W: 3141 L: 2944 D: 10667
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1
Version of my last try with half eval (+ fix of assert in evaluate_passed_pawns). Set prio to -1 to wait for the other version.
17-04-27 sg passed_pawn_break diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 5934 W: 1160 L: 1009 D: 3765
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1
Bonus for pawn sacrifice which creates an advanced passed pawn
17-04-23 sg sort_tweak diff
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 21408 W: 3833 L: 3917 D: 13658
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1
My LTC test seems not good so far so perhaps more sorting is needed at higher depths. Test against passed sortLinearRebase patch.