| 19-08-18 |
Voy |
nmpSC6b |
diff
|
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 39111 W: 8854 L: 8495 D: 21762
|
sprt
@ 10+0.1 th 1 |
stc |
| 19-08-18 |
Viz |
noNpmNmpTest2 |
diff
|
ELO: 24.01 +-7.1 (95%) LOS: 100.0%
Total: 4000 W: 1021 L: 745 D: 2234
|
4000
@ 10+0.1 th 1 |
Try also this |
| 19-08-18 |
Viz |
noNpmNmpTest3 |
diff
|
ELO: 19.74 +-7.3 (95%) LOS: 100.0%
Total: 4000 W: 1036 L: 809 D: 2155
|
4000
@ 10+0.1 th 1 |
Try also break instead of continue |
| 19-08-18 |
pro |
ps_futility1 |
diff
|
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 9411 W: 2226 L: 2013 D: 5172
|
sprt
@ 10+0.1 th 1 |
futility equations closer to V's arrays. |
| 19-08-18 |
31m |
tweak_WeakUnopposed |
diff
|
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 113365 W: 25383 L: 24769 D: 63213
|
sprt
@ 10+0.1 th 1 |
Eliminate mg-eg gradient altogether. |
| 19-08-14 |
sni |
master |
diff
|
ELO: 32.24 +-1.9 (95%) LOS: 100.0%
Total: 40000 W: 7869 L: 4168 D: 27963
|
40000
@ 60+0.6 th 1 |
Regression/progression test against SF10 after "Tweak unsafe checks" of August 14th. |
| 19-08-16 |
Elb |
sc_rq |
diff
|
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 14933 W: 3458 L: 3218 D: 8257
|
sprt
@ 10+0.1 th 1 |
Queen and Rook checks tweak |
| 19-08-15 |
Viz |
futilityArrayLTC |
diff
|
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,3.50]
Total: 33913 W: 5800 L: 5529 D: 22584
|
sprt
@ 60+0.6 th 1 |
LTC with new master and full TP now to be safe. |
| 19-08-14 |
Viz |
futilityArray1 |
diff
|
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 85676 W: 14530 L: 14034 D: 57112
|
sprt
@ 60+0.6 th 1 |
This is doing reasonable at STC so try LTC for truncated array till depth 7.
STC bounds for faster results, 1/3 TP. |
| 19-08-15 |
xor |
qstatT |
diff
|
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 22054 W: 5050 L: 4775 D: 12229
|
sprt
@ 10+0.1 th 1 |
take 1. |
| 19-08-13 |
pro |
ps_mobilityknights1 |
diff
|
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 20025 W: 4510 L: 4385 D: 11130
|
sprt
@ 10+0.1 th 1 |
try an equation for knights mobility. For info only. Low tp. |
| 19-08-13 |
Voy |
nmpCombo |
diff
|
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,3.50]
Total: 73895 W: 12496 L: 12114 D: 49285
|
sprt
@ 60+0.6 th 1 |
ltc |
| 19-08-13 |
sg |
tweak_unsafe_checks |
diff
|
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,3.50]
Total: 84968 W: 14499 L: 14083 D: 56386
|
sprt
@ 60+0.6 th 1 |
LTC: Same bonus for all unsafe checks (equivalent to W=148). |
| 19-08-13 |
Voy |
nmpCombo |
diff
|
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 19675 W: 4430 L: 4169 D: 11076
|
sprt
@ 10+0.1 th 1 |
stc |
| 19-08-12 |
sg |
tweak_unsafe_checks |
diff
|
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 124526 W: 28292 L: 27504 D: 68730
|
sprt
@ 10+0.1 th 1 |
Same bonus for all unsafe checks (equivalent to W=148). |
| 19-08-12 |
pro |
ps_castlingside2 |
diff
|
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 53854 W: 12077 L: 12019 D: 29758
|
sprt
@ 10+0.1 th 1 |
integrate CastlingSide into CastlingRights and simplify. v3 |
| 19-08-12 |
Viz |
futilityTweakScale7 |
diff
|
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 38479 W: 8841 L: 8482 D: 21156
|
sprt
@ 10+0.1 th 1 |
Try also this |
| 19-08-12 |
Viz |
futilityTweakScale2 |
diff
|
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 6427 W: 1568 L: 1369 D: 3490
|
sprt
@ 10+0.1 th 1 |
Take 2 |
| 19-08-12 |
Viz |
futPrTweak2 |
diff
|
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 16517 W: 3746 L: 3516 D: 9255
|
sprt
@ 10+0.1 th 1 |
Take 2 |
| 19-08-11 |
Viz |
futPrTweak1 |
diff
|
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 34925 W: 8037 L: 7731 D: 19157
|
sprt
@ 10+0.1 th 1 |
Take 1 |
| 19-08-10 |
Voy |
nmpImp2 |
diff
|
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 55803 W: 8512 L: 8443 D: 38848
|
sprt
@ 120+1.2 th 1 |
There are some concerns of scaling for this passed patch. Make sure it doesn't regress at VLTC. (Lower TP to not hog up resources) |
| 19-08-11 |
pro |
ps_bitboards2 |
diff
|
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 59107 W: 13217 L: 13170 D: 32720
|
sprt
@ 10+0.1 th 1 |
simplify Files and Ranks. |
| 19-08-09 |
Voy |
nmpConst |
diff
|
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 27806 W: 6296 L: 6021 D: 15489
|
sprt
@ 10+0.1 th 1 |
Is my nmp green patches simply because of this const? |
| 19-08-07 |
Viz |
nmpImp1 |
diff
|
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 153285 W: 34588 L: 33660 D: 85037
|
sprt
@ 10+0.1 th 1 |
Take 1 |
| 19-08-06 |
Voy |
nmpImp2 |
diff
|
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,3.50]
Total: 179493 W: 30198 L: 29521 D: 119774
|
sprt
@ 60+0.6 th 1 |
LTC: I think this may fare better than the current one at LTC. (Place current at pri. -1). |
| 19-08-08 |
Voy |
nmpMC3 |
diff
|
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 32138 W: 7304 L: 6979 D: 17855
|
sprt
@ 10+0.1 th 1 |
One more ver. |
| 19-08-06 |
MJZ |
NMP-lastMove2 |
diff
|
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 150356 W: 33983 L: 33068 D: 83305
|
sprt
@ 10+0.1 th 1 |
Back to original idea : NMP if staticEval decrease in last move. Threshold 140 |
| 19-08-05 |
vdv |
NMPtweak^ |
diff
|
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 196534 W: 44087 L: 43141 D: 109306
|
sprt
@ 10+0.1 th 1 |
Tweak. |
| 19-08-07 |
Voy |
xotCapP |
diff
|
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 28797 W: 6522 L: 6243 D: 16032
|
sprt
@ 10+0.1 th 1 |
stc |
| 19-08-03 |
xot |
searchstats1 |
diff
|
ELO: 12.52 +-2.6 (95%) LOS: 100.0%
Total: 19291 W: 3119 L: 2424 D: 13748
|
20000
@ 180+1.8 th 1 |
VLTC to see how this big param tune scales after LTC (since tune was done at ltc). See discussion at https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/2260 Low tp as I don't want to slow down the ltc tests that are currently running too much. |
| 19-08-06 |
xot |
nmptest2 |
diff
|
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 86656 W: 19736 L: 19137 D: 47783
|
sprt
@ 10+0.1 th 1 |
Nmp test, 45*depth - 3*rootdepth + 299. |
| 19-08-06 |
Voy |
nmpImp2 |
diff
|
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 39889 W: 9125 L: 8760 D: 22004
|
sprt
@ 10+0.1 th 1 |
LTC is struggling... try 55 |
| 19-08-06 |
xot |
nmptest2 |
diff
|
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 19165 W: 4435 L: 4174 D: 10556
|
sprt
@ 10+0.1 th 1 |
Nmp test, -33*d + 11*rd + 57. |
| 19-08-05 |
vdv |
NMPtweak |
diff
|
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 45584 W: 10325 L: 9978 D: 25281
|
sprt
@ 10+0.1 th 1 |
Tweak. Take 4. |
| 19-08-05 |
Voy |
nmpImp |
diff
|
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 40397 W: 9234 L: 8867 D: 22296
|
sprt
@ 10+0.1 th 1 |
Take 2 |
| 19-08-04 |
Voy |
xotNMP |
diff
|
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 74763 W: 16962 L: 16498 D: 41303
|
sprt
@ 10+0.1 th 1 |
Use original parameters for NMP... |
| 19-08-04 |
MJZ |
NMP-ply_lastMove |
diff
|
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 39012 W: 8821 L: 8463 D: 21728
|
sprt
@ 10+0.1 th 1 |
NMP staticEval formula : try after tuning parameters. |
| 19-08-04 |
xor |
cmp3 |
diff
|
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 11062 W: 2534 L: 2315 D: 6213
|
sprt
@ 10+0.1 th 1 |
retry after recent tune. |
| 19-08-02 |
pro |
ps_castlingside1 |
diff
|
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 86639 W: 19261 L: 19269 D: 48109
|
sprt
@ 10+0.1 th 1 |
integrate CastlingSide into CastlingRight. |
| 19-08-02 |
pro |
ps_pieces1 |
diff
|
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 69015 W: 15602 L: 15575 D: 37838
|
sprt
@ 10+0.1 th 1 |
consolidate piece methods. |
| 19-08-01 |
Viz |
singBetaTweak4 |
diff
|
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 78973 W: 17872 L: 17313 D: 43788
|
sprt
@ 10+0.1 th 1 |
Take 4 |
| 19-08-01 |
Viz |
singBetaTweak2 |
diff
|
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 34134 W: 7756 L: 7455 D: 18923
|
sprt
@ 10+0.1 th 1 |
Take 2 |
| 19-08-01 |
MJZ |
NMP-depthCap |
diff
|
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 14506 W: 3738 L: 3505 D: 7263
|
sprt
@ 5+0.05 th 1 |
Preliminary test at VSTC : this test can perhaps explain why last patch is good @LTC and bad @STC. Correction in next try |
| 19-07-31 |
MJZ |
NMP-lastMove |
diff
|
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 31495 W: 7182 L: 6860 D: 17453
|
sprt
@ 10+0.1 th 1 |
NMP if staticEval decrease from last position. Threshold 120 |
| 19-07-31 |
MJZ |
NMP-lastMove2 |
diff
|
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 25651 W: 5939 L: 5644 D: 14068
|
sprt
@ 10+0.1 th 1 |
NMP if staticEval decrease from last position. Threshold 160 |
| 19-07-30 |
xot |
searchstats1 |
diff
|
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 8004 W: 1432 L: 1252 D: 5320
|
sprt
@ 60+0.6 th 1 |
LTC rerun with correct bounds: All param changes from whole of tune. See discussion at https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/2260 |
| 19-07-30 |
xot |
searchstats1 |
diff
|
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 12954 W: 2280 L: 2074 D: 8600
|
sprt
@ 60+0.6 th 1 |
LTC: All param changes from whole of tune, test directly at ltc since tune was at ltc. Feel free to lower the priority if you think this counts as a speculative test. |
| 19-07-25 |
Ala |
master |
diff
|
ELO: 37.49 +-1.7 (95%) LOS: 100.0%
Total: 40000 W: 7524 L: 3225 D: 29251
|
40000
@ 30+0.3 th 8 |
Multicore regression/progression test against SF10 after "Tweak of SEE pruning condition" of July 25th. |
| 19-07-29 |
pro |
ps_scores10 |
diff
|
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 59571 W: 13147 L: 13100 D: 33324
|
sprt
@ 10+0.1 th 1 |
typedef for scores. For info only. |
| 19-07-28 |
pro |
ps_combos2 |
diff
|
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 25465 W: 5684 L: 5570 D: 14211
|
sprt
@ 10+0.1 th 1 |
combo of all my current simplifications. |