Stockfish Testing Queue

Finished - 5062 tests

19-08-18 Voy nmpSC6b diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 39111 W: 8854 L: 8495 D: 21762
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 stc
19-08-18 Viz noNpmNmpTest2 diff
ELO: 24.01 +-7.1 (95%) LOS: 100.0%
Total: 4000 W: 1021 L: 745 D: 2234
4000 @ 10+0.1 th 1 Try also this
19-08-18 Viz noNpmNmpTest3 diff
ELO: 19.74 +-7.3 (95%) LOS: 100.0%
Total: 4000 W: 1036 L: 809 D: 2155
4000 @ 10+0.1 th 1 Try also break instead of continue
19-08-18 pro ps_futility1 diff
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 9411 W: 2226 L: 2013 D: 5172
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 futility equations closer to V's arrays.
19-08-18 31m tweak_WeakUnopposed diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 113365 W: 25383 L: 24769 D: 63213
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Eliminate mg-eg gradient altogether.
19-08-14 sni master diff
ELO: 32.24 +-1.9 (95%) LOS: 100.0%
Total: 40000 W: 7869 L: 4168 D: 27963
40000 @ 60+0.6 th 1 Regression/progression test against SF10 after "Tweak unsafe checks" of August 14th.
19-08-16 Elb sc_rq diff
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 14933 W: 3458 L: 3218 D: 8257
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Queen and Rook checks tweak
19-08-15 Viz futilityArrayLTC diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,3.50]
Total: 33913 W: 5800 L: 5529 D: 22584
sprt @ 60+0.6 th 1 LTC with new master and full TP now to be safe.
19-08-14 Viz futilityArray1 diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 85676 W: 14530 L: 14034 D: 57112
sprt @ 60+0.6 th 1 This is doing reasonable at STC so try LTC for truncated array till depth 7. STC bounds for faster results, 1/3 TP.
19-08-15 xor qstatT diff
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 22054 W: 5050 L: 4775 D: 12229
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 take 1.
19-08-13 pro ps_mobilityknights1 diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 20025 W: 4510 L: 4385 D: 11130
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 try an equation for knights mobility. For info only. Low tp.
19-08-13 Voy nmpCombo diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,3.50]
Total: 73895 W: 12496 L: 12114 D: 49285
sprt @ 60+0.6 th 1 ltc
19-08-13 sg tweak_unsafe_checks diff
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,3.50]
Total: 84968 W: 14499 L: 14083 D: 56386
sprt @ 60+0.6 th 1 LTC: Same bonus for all unsafe checks (equivalent to W=148).
19-08-13 Voy nmpCombo diff
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 19675 W: 4430 L: 4169 D: 11076
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 stc
19-08-12 sg tweak_unsafe_checks diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 124526 W: 28292 L: 27504 D: 68730
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Same bonus for all unsafe checks (equivalent to W=148).
19-08-12 pro ps_castlingside2 diff
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 53854 W: 12077 L: 12019 D: 29758
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 integrate CastlingSide into CastlingRights and simplify. v3
19-08-12 Viz futilityTweakScale7 diff
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 38479 W: 8841 L: 8482 D: 21156
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Try also this
19-08-12 Viz futilityTweakScale2 diff
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 6427 W: 1568 L: 1369 D: 3490
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 2
19-08-12 Viz futPrTweak2 diff
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 16517 W: 3746 L: 3516 D: 9255
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 2
19-08-11 Viz futPrTweak1 diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 34925 W: 8037 L: 7731 D: 19157
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 1
19-08-10 Voy nmpImp2 diff
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 55803 W: 8512 L: 8443 D: 38848
sprt @ 120+1.2 th 1 There are some concerns of scaling for this passed patch. Make sure it doesn't regress at VLTC. (Lower TP to not hog up resources)
19-08-11 pro ps_bitboards2 diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 59107 W: 13217 L: 13170 D: 32720
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 simplify Files and Ranks.
19-08-09 Voy nmpConst diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 27806 W: 6296 L: 6021 D: 15489
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Is my nmp green patches simply because of this const?
19-08-07 Viz nmpImp1 diff
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 153285 W: 34588 L: 33660 D: 85037
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 1
19-08-06 Voy nmpImp2 diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,3.50]
Total: 179493 W: 30198 L: 29521 D: 119774
sprt @ 60+0.6 th 1 LTC: I think this may fare better than the current one at LTC. (Place current at pri. -1).
19-08-08 Voy nmpMC3 diff
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 32138 W: 7304 L: 6979 D: 17855
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 One more ver.
19-08-06 MJZ NMP-lastMove2 diff
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 150356 W: 33983 L: 33068 D: 83305
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Back to original idea : NMP if staticEval decrease in last move. Threshold 140
19-08-05 vdv NMPtweak^ diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 196534 W: 44087 L: 43141 D: 109306
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Tweak.
19-08-07 Voy xotCapP diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 28797 W: 6522 L: 6243 D: 16032
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 stc
19-08-03 xot searchstats1 diff
ELO: 12.52 +-2.6 (95%) LOS: 100.0%
Total: 19291 W: 3119 L: 2424 D: 13748
20000 @ 180+1.8 th 1 VLTC to see how this big param tune scales after LTC (since tune was done at ltc). See discussion at https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/2260 Low tp as I don't want to slow down the ltc tests that are currently running too much.
19-08-06 xot nmptest2 diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 86656 W: 19736 L: 19137 D: 47783
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Nmp test, 45*depth - 3*rootdepth + 299.
19-08-06 Voy nmpImp2 diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 39889 W: 9125 L: 8760 D: 22004
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 LTC is struggling... try 55
19-08-06 xot nmptest2 diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 19165 W: 4435 L: 4174 D: 10556
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Nmp test, -33*d + 11*rd + 57.
19-08-05 vdv NMPtweak diff
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 45584 W: 10325 L: 9978 D: 25281
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Tweak. Take 4.
19-08-05 Voy nmpImp diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 40397 W: 9234 L: 8867 D: 22296
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 2
19-08-04 Voy xotNMP diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 74763 W: 16962 L: 16498 D: 41303
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Use original parameters for NMP...
19-08-04 MJZ NMP-ply_lastMove diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 39012 W: 8821 L: 8463 D: 21728
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 NMP staticEval formula : try after tuning parameters.
19-08-04 xor cmp3 diff
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 11062 W: 2534 L: 2315 D: 6213
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 retry after recent tune.
19-08-02 pro ps_castlingside1 diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 86639 W: 19261 L: 19269 D: 48109
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 integrate CastlingSide into CastlingRight.
19-08-02 pro ps_pieces1 diff
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 69015 W: 15602 L: 15575 D: 37838
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 consolidate piece methods.
19-08-01 Viz singBetaTweak4 diff
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 78973 W: 17872 L: 17313 D: 43788
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 4
19-08-01 Viz singBetaTweak2 diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 34134 W: 7756 L: 7455 D: 18923
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 2
19-08-01 MJZ NMP-depthCap diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 14506 W: 3738 L: 3505 D: 7263
sprt @ 5+0.05 th 1 Preliminary test at VSTC : this test can perhaps explain why last patch is good @LTC and bad @STC. Correction in next try
19-07-31 MJZ NMP-lastMove diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 31495 W: 7182 L: 6860 D: 17453
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 NMP if staticEval decrease from last position. Threshold 120
19-07-31 MJZ NMP-lastMove2 diff
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 25651 W: 5939 L: 5644 D: 14068
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 NMP if staticEval decrease from last position. Threshold 160
19-07-30 xot searchstats1 diff
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 8004 W: 1432 L: 1252 D: 5320
sprt @ 60+0.6 th 1 LTC rerun with correct bounds: All param changes from whole of tune. See discussion at https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/2260
19-07-30 xot searchstats1 diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 12954 W: 2280 L: 2074 D: 8600
sprt @ 60+0.6 th 1 LTC: All param changes from whole of tune, test directly at ltc since tune was at ltc. Feel free to lower the priority if you think this counts as a speculative test.
19-07-25 Ala master diff
ELO: 37.49 +-1.7 (95%) LOS: 100.0%
Total: 40000 W: 7524 L: 3225 D: 29251
40000 @ 30+0.3 th 8 Multicore regression/progression test against SF10 after "Tweak of SEE pruning condition" of July 25th.
19-07-29 pro ps_scores10 diff
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 59571 W: 13147 L: 13100 D: 33324
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 typedef for scores. For info only.
19-07-28 pro ps_combos2 diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 25465 W: 5684 L: 5570 D: 14211
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 combo of all my current simplifications.