Stockfish Testing Queue

Finished - 4317 tests

18-12-18 Viz countTw3 diff
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 47623 W: 10703 L: 10335 D: 26585
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 3
18-12-18 Viz countTw6 diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 31851 W: 7113 L: 6825 D: 17913
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 6
18-12-17 Fis voting diff
ELO: 5.63 +-2.8 (95%) LOS: 100.0%
Total: 20000 W: 3539 L: 3215 D: 13246
20000 @ 5+0.05 th 31 20K 31 Threads. New way to calculate votes 2.
18-12-17 Jek master diff
ELO: 7.85 +-1.7 (95%) LOS: 100.0%
Total: 41148 W: 6037 L: 5107 D: 30004
40000 @ 60+0.6 th 1 after Author: 31m059 Date: Sun Dec 16 10:04:49 2018 +0100 Timestamp: 1544951089 Use stronglyProtected
18-12-17 pb0 penalty diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 35073 W: 5886 L: 5625 D: 23562
sprt @ 60+0.6 th 1 Spec. LTC for this yellow http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5c121e730ebc5902ba11aad8 (rebased to current master)
18-12-17 31m simplify_candidatePasse diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 93489 W: 20433 L: 20453 D: 52603
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Experiment with the effect size of bonus in the simplified version. 3/4.
18-12-17 31m simplify_candidatePasse diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 16750 W: 3707 L: 3576 D: 9467
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 If we have two doubled pawns, which would otherwise be considered passed, do we need to not consider the back pawn passed?
18-12-17 Fis voting diff
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 14330 W: 2290 L: 2115 D: 9925
sprt @ 20+0.2 th 8 LTC New way to calculate votes 2.
18-12-16 Fis voting diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 20202 W: 4031 L: 3813 D: 12358
sprt @ 5+0.05 th 8 New way to calculate votes 2.
18-12-16 han cycle_simpl diff
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 87919 W: 19152 L: 19160 D: 49607
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Try checking in qsearch to compensate
18-12-15 nic np_poplsb_opt diff
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 40810 W: 8962 L: 8878 D: 22970
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Tried replacing a bitboard pointer with a reference in poplsb: I think getting rid of the ampersand unclutters the code and yields better-looking C++, and might even help the compiler out. ;-)
18-12-15 Roc KRSimplify diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 9494 W: 2191 L: 2045 D: 5258
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 KRS-2 Fixed code Run as a simplification, since it reduces the number of processor instructions (line 313 is called for each piece)
18-12-15 31m simplify_RestrictedPiec diff
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 37078 W: 6125 L: 6030 D: 24923
sprt @ 60+0.6 th 1 LTC. Use ~stronglyProtected to calculate RestrictedPiece.
18-12-15 31m simplify_RestrictedPiec diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 35924 W: 7978 L: 7885 D: 20061
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 A fairly intuitive simplification: ~stronglyProtected is quite similar to (and simpler than) ~attackedBy[Them][PAWN] & ~attackedBy2[Them]. The only difference is that this includes squares attacked twice by both sides.
18-12-15 31m RookOnQueen^ diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 15159 W: 3398 L: 3193 D: 8568
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Attempt to revive my threat_strongqueen idea with a RookOnPawn-style approach (i.e., based on the rook's rank). Use ThreatByRook[QUEEN] / 2 for now, since it worked well in my previous attempts.
18-12-15 Viz MobAreaSl4 diff
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 13826 W: 3135 L: 2935 D: 7756
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 take 4
18-12-13 sni master diff
ELO: 8.06 +-1.8 (95%) LOS: 100.0%
Total: 40000 W: 5948 L: 5020 D: 29032
40000 @ 60+0.6 th 1 Regression/progression test against SF10 after "A combo of parameter tweaks" of December, 13th
18-12-13 Voy pruningT diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 18088 W: 4120 L: 3884 D: 10084
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Stc
18-12-13 Viz QoverloadImb8 diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 25473 W: 5685 L: 5429 D: 14359
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 4
18-12-13 31m simplify_pruningNPM diff
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 33868 W: 5663 L: 5563 D: 22642
sprt @ 60+0.6 th 1 LTC. I am submitting this LTC even though the [0, 4] conflicts with it and is also performing well--this is the same change as the [0, 4], only further, and has a similar Elo estimate so far. Therefore I would initially guess that that patch could be successfully simplified into this one, if this passes LTC.
18-12-13 31m tweak_pruningNPM4 diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 20685 W: 4623 L: 4378 D: 11684
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Further increase: value 15,000.
18-12-13 31m simplify_pruningNPM diff
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 13445 W: 3000 L: 2862 D: 7583
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Increasing this threshold by degrees I originally thought would be ridiculous actually seems slightly Elo-gaining (6K, 7K, 8K, 10K all produced long yellow [0, 4] runs; 15K appears to possibly be promising at the moment). As this threshold increases, this condition activates less and less often but Elo seems to slightly increase. Can we simplify it away altogether?
18-12-12 SFi combo_2 diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 44207 W: 7451 L: 7157 D: 29599
sprt @ 60+0.6 th 1 LTC: combo 2
18-12-12 Viz KDqueenImb2 diff
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 11979 W: 2721 L: 2531 D: 6727
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 2
18-12-12 xot tempo2 diff
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 25660 W: 5726 L: 5461 D: 14473
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 change tempo to 22, only 1 tempo for null moves.
18-12-12 SFi combo_4 diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 20846 W: 4651 L: 4406 D: 11789
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 combo 4
18-12-12 SFi combo_3 diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 18403 W: 4170 L: 3933 D: 10300
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 combo 3
18-12-12 SFi combo_2 diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 9005 W: 2082 L: 1882 D: 5041
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 combo 2
18-12-12 Viz Ccombo2 diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 13653 W: 3064 L: 2847 D: 7742
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 2.
18-12-12 Viz Ccombo1 diff
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 22047 W: 4934 L: 4683 D: 12430
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 1
18-12-12 pro ps_sliders4 diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 86902 W: 19027 L: 19034 D: 48841
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 saves one operation (sry, my cygwin keeps generating incorrect benches).
18-12-11 pro ps_color2 diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 37584 W: 8210 L: 8120 D: 21254
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 crazy test. . . try color as a boolean. Removes ~color swap operator using a more natural logical NOT (!) to swap colors.
18-12-11 Viz statScInit1 diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 18889 W: 4157 L: 3935 D: 10797
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 1
18-12-11 xor TempoT diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 37553 W: 8343 L: 8032 D: 21178
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Value 28.
18-12-10 Che NoTempo diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 81816 W: 13469 L: 13445 D: 54902
sprt @ 60+0.6 th 1 NoTempo Removes Tempo bonus LTC test since STC passed
18-12-10 Che NoTempo diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 31090 W: 6866 L: 6763 D: 17461
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 NoTempo Removes Tempo bonus
18-12-08 SFi tweak_mobility diff
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 37129 W: 8240 L: 7930 D: 20959
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 take 2
18-12-08 pro ps_oppositecolors1 diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 34663 W: 7587 L: 7491 D: 19585
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 try to simplify opposite colors.
18-12-08 SFi tweak_BRpsqt diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 25853 W: 5794 L: 5528 D: 14531
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 take 2
18-12-08 IIv 8x8ppsqt_tuned diff
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 29120 W: 6414 L: 6137 D: 16569
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Talk 2 - half of the change.
18-12-08 Che RemoveIID diff
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 157052 W: 34367 L: 34512 D: 88173
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 RemoveIID Is IID really worth 2elo? Remove it entirely.
18-12-07 Che SingularTweakDepth2d3 diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 48373 W: 10744 L: 10390 D: 27239
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 SingularTweakDepth2d3 Changes depth to 2+depth/3
18-12-07 pro ps_sliderblockers1 diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 60988 W: 13372 L: 13328 D: 34288
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 try a nonfunctional simplification of slider_blockers.
18-12-07 Che FutilityNonPV diff
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 35641 W: 7921 L: 7617 D: 20103
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 FutilityNonPV Changes the !rootNode to !PvNode
18-12-06 sni master diff
ELO: 4.32 +-1.7 (95%) LOS: 100.0%
Total: 40000 W: 5530 L: 5033 D: 29437
40000 @ 60+0.6 th 1 Regression/progression test against SF10 after "Revert "pseudo_legal() and MOVE_NONE"" of December, 6th
18-12-07 Viz PawnFork8 diff
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 18815 W: 4224 L: 4000 D: 10591
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 Take 8
18-12-06 pro ps_blockers1 diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 140102 W: 30209 L: 30319 D: 79574
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 try to simplify a slider_blocker.
18-12-05 Voy cmpT2 diff
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 50360 W: 8424 L: 8102 D: 33834
sprt @ 60+0.6 th 1 Speculative LTC: I think this may scale well... low tp.
18-12-04 pro ps_mkpd11 diff
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 32629 W: 7121 L: 7021 D: 18487
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 try to remove DistanceRingBB.
18-12-04 xor noPC diff
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 13136 W: 2960 L: 2764 D: 7412
sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 skip probcut altogether on excludedMove.